women and girls<\/em>). In the European Union, nine million women have experienced online violence since the age of 15 (European Agency for Fundamental Rights, FRA). <\/p>\n90% of victims of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images are women (Report by the UN Special Rapporteur on online violence). In Spain, 19.5% of women between the ages of 16 and 74 have been harassed at some point in their lives, and 85.8% of the perpetrators are men (European Survey on Gender-Based Violence 2022, Government Delegation against Gender-Based Violence). <\/p>\n
Furthermore, 84.8% of the victims of a cybercrime recorded in 2023 were minors under the age of 18 and 96% of those investigated or arrested for these crimes were men (Ministry of the Interior, Report on crimes against sexual freedom 2023).<\/p>\n
AI does not create this reality, but it may be amplifying it: sexual deepfakes, automation of image dissemination, algorithmic viralisation of hate speech… The study Violence against women, girls, boys and adolescents in the digital sphere<\/em> (Ministry of Equality, 2025) shows how these new forms of cyberviolence disproportionately affect women and minors. <\/p>\nHow does this impact communication? Algorithms don’t just distribute content: they decide what we see first. And what gets amplified becomes the dominant narrative<\/strong>. <\/p>\nCommunication: a feminised profession, but who is leading the transformation?<\/strong><\/h2>\nIn Spain, corporate communication, journalism and public relations have a very high female presence at the grassroots and intermediate levels. It is a profession with a woman’s touch<\/strong>. <\/p>\nHowever, this should lead us to ask ourselves: who is leading the integration of artificial intelligence in agencies and departments? artificial intelligence in agencies and departments? Who defines the ethical standards for its use? Who pilots technological innovation internally? To whom are attributed the contents about AI and digital reputation?<\/p>\n
In an ecosystem where artificial intelligence automates newsrooms, optimises headlines, predicts behaviour of audiences and redefines metrics of impact, mastering the tool implies mastering decision-making and, therefore, the narrative will adapt to its programmers.<\/p>\n
And therein lies the risk: that in a sector that is predominantly female at its core, the technological layer (and, therefore, strategic and narrative power) will once again be concentrated in male profiles. And this is not due to a lack of talent\u2014which has been more than proven\u2014but rather to the structural inertia<\/strong> that persists. <\/p>\nSufficient references to lead the positioning<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe question is not whether there are women prepared to lead the conversation on artificial intelligence in communication. The question is whether the sector\u2014and the media ecosystem\u2014is placing those voices where they belong: at the centre of the debate. Because when we talk about AI applied to reputation, content generation, process automation or algorithmic ethics, we are not dealing with an isolated technical conversation; we are dealing with a profound redefinition of the corporate narrative. And in communication, narrative is power. <\/p>\n
In our country, we have renowned female leaders in communications, and it is our duty to highlight their achievements: Lu\u00edsa Garc\u00eda (LLYC); M\u00f3nica Gonz\u00e1lez (AXICOM); Ludi Garc\u00eda and Carlota Marco (SEC NEWGATE); Luc\u00eda Carballeda (EDELMAN); N\u00faria Vilanova and Asun Soriano (ATREVIA); Sonia D\u00edaz and Juana Pulido (ESTUDIO DE COMUNICACI\u00d3N); Carme Mir\u00f3 (APPLE TREE); Silvia Alsina (ROMAN); Paula Carrera and B\u00e1rbara Navarro (TORRES Y CARRERA); Natalia S\u00e1nchez and Raquel Capellas (Weber Shandwick Spain); Ana Pic\u00f3 (Havas PR); Noelia Cruzado and Diana Vall (MARCO); Valvanuz Serna and Luc\u00eda Casanueva (PROA Comunicaci\u00f3n); Carmen Basagoiti (HARMON); and our CEO and founder, Silvia Albert, among many others.<\/p>\n
Interestingly, if we look at the technological layer (areas of AI, innovation, Big Data, or digital transformation), the picture changes dramatically. In several of these organisations that have specific AI departments, those responsible for the technical structures that feed the models, data and automation tools are all men. In other words, female business leadership is visible, but technological leadership is much less so, and when it does appear, it tends to be masculinised. <\/p>\n
8M: from talent to technological leadership<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis 8M, perhaps the conversation should not focus solely on how many women work in communications (because yes, they are in the majority) but on something more decisive: how many are leading the transition<\/strong> to artificial intelligence.<\/p>\nThe digital divide is no longer just a question of access to devices or STEM education. It is a question of technological power within the digital world. of technological power within strategic areas. <\/p>\n
Artificial intelligence is redefining how stories are produced, distributed, and evaluated. If women do not occupy central positions in this redefinition, their influence will be limited at the most transformative moment in the profession in decades. <\/p>\n
AI is not the future of communication. It is its present. And leadership in this new environment cannot afford to become masculinised again without at least being aware of it. It is not just a question of equality, but of us all working together to build the narrative<\/strong> in the age of artificial intelligence. <\/p>\n